Mr. Rogers’ Neighborhood

Internet service providers get little love these days it seems. In my town I have a choice of two – one really if I don’t want to get TV via satellite dish. My local monopolist is Rogers Communications.

Generally Mr. Rogers gives good service although I pay him well for the privilege. And don’t expect him to tell you if he has a better deal.

Lately one of the guys in my coffee group got a new Rogers modem installed and for once he didn’t have to attach a separate router to it to get decent wifi speeds. The early Rogers combination Internet gateways were horrible. No speed anywhere in the house more than a couple meters from the gateway.

So I got sniffing round the Rogers website and discovered what looked like a better deal for a few bucks more. Faster speed, new modem and more bandwidth. I started chatting with a Rogers rep (in Moncton I think) and she did even better – almost double the speed and unlimited bandwidth for about the same price. An offer I couldn’t refuse.

The catch? I had to switch my older but nicely functioning Cisco modem for a new Hitron Rocket Modem. I noticed really bad performance with Hitron gateways when my friends and family used them – that’s why I made the local Rogers store give me a Cisco modem in the first place. But the deal was too good to resist. Besides I figured I could always reattach my old router if need be.

Well how wrong I was. The Rogers store in Carleton Place gave me one of the latest and fastest Hitron modems. My wired connection to the upstairs desktop is just flying. And I didn’t have to reconnect the external modem. The internal wifi in the Hitron gateway is providing just as good if not better speeds than I was getting with my earlier, more complex setup. Looks great so far.

Maybe you have to nag Mr. Rogers a bit, but in the end he does the job.

The Next Great Linux Platform

 

I’ve been installing and running Linux as an alternate to Windows for over 10 years now. In that time:

  1. I’ve installed Linux as a replacement for Windows systems that were obsolete or slow.
  2. I bought a couple of netbooks that came with Linux pre-installed.
  3. I had a desktop system built without Windows to run Linux only. It’s only run Linux in its useful life.
  4. I built my own desktop system to run Linux only. No Windows ever installed.
  5. I’ve installed many types of Linux in “Virtual Machines” to test and run inside Windows.

Since probably 95% of all computers ever made run some form of Windows, most of my experience is with case #1. And the key to a successful Linux replacement is how the original Windows-centered hardware responds to a Linux installation.

In my years of doing this I have encountered two really great platforms that are the essence of “Linux friendly” design:

  1. Dell Dimension desktop systems from the early 2000s.
  2. Lenovo Thinkpad laptops.

Both of these systems are based on Intel architecture – processors and motherboards. In addition the Thinkpads generally have Intel graphics and wireless adapters.

All hardware will work with Windows but Intel has done the best at being compatible with Linux over the years.

The early Dell desktops were solidly built machines that were almost exclusively Intel based. They did not have a lot of built in peripherals – you had to choose your ethernet card, graphics card – even a sound card. If you bought Dell all this stuff tended to be Linux friendly as well as Windows friendly.

I almost took it for granted that if a computer ran Windows it would run Linux. Sadly my experience with other motherboards, graphics solutions and especially wifi soon taught me otherwise. But an early Dell desktop? It never let me down.

As the desktop era wound down and Dell outsourced its production to Asia, things changed. New Dell laptops – especially their cheaper models – became notoriously unfriendly to Linux. The worst offenders were Dell’s wifi cards – they were made by Broadcom, and there was a time around 2009 when it was a crapshoot if you could get wifi to work in Linux at all with a Dell laptop.

This was a big problem because it’s a lot harder to upgrade and replace parts in a laptop – what you see is what you get.

Fortunately for Linux advocates the next great Linux platform was emerging and it was a laptop – the Lenovo Thinkpad.

Now you don’t just go out and buy a new Thinkpad unless you are a business like Unilever. They cost thousands. A lot of Thinkpads are leased and after a few years come back to a refurbisher. Then they are checked out, cleaned up and sold through companies like Canada Computers for a fraction of the original price.

So it was that I ended up with a beautifully preserved Thinkpad T430 (circa 2013.) it must have been an executive’s laptop. It looks brand new and has extra memory and a Samsung solid state drive. It’s all Intel – processor, graphics, ethernet, wifi.

I figure this machine likely ran Windows 7 but it was refurbished to run Windows 10. However I wanted it to run Linux so I wiped the SSD and installed Debian. I had to do a bit of geek work to get the wifi to go but everything else was fine.

Had I chosen a more mainstream version of Linux like Ubuntu everything would have worked right out of the box. I kept a Windows 10 image in case but I doubt I’ll ever install it – maybe as a Virtual Machine but I really don’t need it for anything.

This powerful laptop boots up to the desktop in 10 seconds and it flies on any task I want it to do. It is like 2005 all over again – and I have experienced the next great Linux platform.

Retooling

 

I recently read a book called “Janesville – An American Story” by Washington Post reporter Amy Goldstein. It was gripping and thoroughly readable – but it doesn’t have a happy ending.

Janesville – as I found out – is a medium sized city in Southern Wisconsin near the Illinois border. It is famous as the home town of conservative American politician Paul Ryan, and as the founding site of the Parker Pen Company. But Janesville’s biggest employer for close to 90 years was the massive GM assembly plant. Four generations of Janesville people worked in the plant or at one of the supporting factories that supplied it. It was never easy work but it paid well enough to support a middle class lifestyle for the 7000 or so workers at the plant. They figured it would be there another century or so.

The Great Recession , high oil prices and the GM insolvency dictated otherwise. The plant closed in December 2008 (mothballed at the time, permanently closed 7 years later.) At the end it was building gas guzzling Suburbans and Tahoes and GM didn’t offer the plant a new more fuel efficient product.

The American story follows the fortunes of a few families and influential people in the town. It is at times inspirational with tales of self-sacrifice and hard work; at other times it’s totally depressing with accounts of desperation, poverty and death. It’s well worth the read.

What struck me the most was that studies by Goldstein and labor economists seem to disprove the generally accepted wisdom that the best course of action when a labor force is displaced is to invest heavily in retraining those folks for new and supposedly better jobs. This axiomatic conclusion seems to be about the only thing both progressive and conservative politicians can agree on these days.

To be sure, a lot of time and money went into technical training for the displaced members of UAW 95. Of the more than 7000 men and women affected, close to 2000 started in to retraining courses at the local community college. They studied everything from Criminal Justice to Heating and Air Conditioning to Electrical Transmission.

One particular couple stands out. The husband leveraged his job as a Union Personnel Rep to train in Human Resources and got a job in HR management. The wife went through the Criminal Justice program, got a job as a Correctional Officer, started part-time studies in social work through a nearby University and ended up working with developmentally delayed individuals. Both liked their jobs better than working in the factory and they got to stay in their home town. Win-win, right?

Well, maybe. The two “new and improved” jobs paid them about the same as one factory job had before. In fact the research carried out by Amy Goldstein’s associates concluded that if you had gone into a retraining program you ended up making 33% less than before and – this is scary – 25% less than displaced workers who didn’t go to school at all.

The reasons for this inconvenient truth about retraining are not clear but some theories put forth include:

  • The workers who didn’t retrain kept working and simply had more hours where they got paid.
  • The displaced workers who didn’t go back to school sucked up the remaining lower skill jobs that were around while the retrainees were – well, retraining.
  • The folks coming out in a new field had to go into entry level positions and it would take years for them to catch up financially to where they were before.

Now it wasn’t all sunshine, rainbows and unicorns for the factory workers who did not return to school. Most of them ended up in jobs with inferior pay and benefits. The best off financially were the “GM gypsies” who left Janesville during the week to live and work in distant cities. The closest GM plant is 4 hours away, and closer Chrysler factories were not hiring. These weekly commuters managed to keep going but they certainly paid the price in family relationships.

I’m still a big fan of retraining – in fact I believe in lifelong learning. Nothing stays the same forever. But it is best to retrain while you still have a job.

In my career I worked in 6 different factories. One is a collection of small businesses today. Another is a warehouse. Another is still open but only half in use. Another went from a flavour company headquarters to a fish processing plant. Another was demolished recently. The one remaining one is facing an uncertain future.

An awful lot of factory workers lost their jobs in those establishments and honestly I don’t know how they all coped with it. I would like to think that if they retrained they found something satisfying and financially OK. But if Amy Goldstein and her associates are correct the odds are against them.

Oh, and in case you were wondering the Parker Pen Company doesn’t have a factory in Janesville either. They closed the final small operation shortly after GM left the town.

 

 

 

 

cww trust seal